★ wanayoo — archive 1999 http://lowendmac.com/benchmarks/iici-presto.shtmlNouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo

Low End MacBenchmarksMac News TodayiBook PageiMac ChannelMacUSBMacInSchoolOnline Tech JournalRoad ApplesMac DanielMiscellaneous RamblingsMac MusingsMenagerie of MacsMac MetamorphosisThings MacintoshView From the Classroom

Register To Win an iBook at Smalldog.com!

MemorytoGo.com | iBook 128MB-$265/64MB-$126 | iMac/PB Wall St.128MB-$226/256MB-$485
G3 Beige128MB-$220 | B&W 128MB$237 | Dimm 64MB$112/128MB $186

Low End Mac
Benchmarks
  Speedometer 3.06
  
Speedometer 4.02
  
SE
  
SE/30
  
Portable
  
PowerBook 170
  
Mac II
  
Mac IIcx
  
Color Classic
  
Color Classic
   
w/Presto 040
  
Mac IIsi
  
Mac IIci
   
w/Presto 040
  
LC III
  
Mac IIfx
  
Quadra 630
  
Quadra 650
  
Centris 660av
  
6100/60, 66
  
UMAX J700
  
iMac, Rev. B
Mac Email Lists
  Compact Macs List
  
Vintage Macs
  
Quadlist (68040)
  
PowerBooks
  
Power Macs
  
SuperMacs
  
Mac Webmasters
  
Mac Managers
Other Pages
  
Real Deals
  
Low End Mac Help Desk
  
Best Buys in Used Macs
  
Low End Mac Select Downloads
  
Older System Software
  
Upgrade or Buy a Newer Mac?
  
Filtering Spam
  
Macspeak
  
Memory Upgrade Guide
  
Apple Timeline
  
Top Pages
Support Low End Mac
  
Outpost.com
  
AuctionMac
  
Amazon.com
  
MusicForce

Benchmarks: IIci + Presto

The IIci has been a workhorse for years. To keep them going a couple years longer, we installed Sonnet Presto 040 cards. These have a 40 MHz 68040 processor and 128 KB level 2 cache.

The tested machine had 20 MB of RAM and a 540 MB Apple-branded Quantum 540S hard drive, which was formatted with Apple HD SC Setup 7.3.5. This is the same configuration as the base IIci benchmarks; the only difference is the Sonnet card.

Remember that benchmarks are arbitrary. They measure certain types of performance that may or may not reflect the way you work.

Speedometer 3.06

Speedometer 3 was not run on this system.

Speedometer 4.02

The system was tested on 12 May 1999 under System 7.5.5. Computer attached to a 14" Apple color monitor with 8-bit video. Results are relative to a Quadra 605, which rates 1.0. Numbers rounded off to two decimal places.

The first set of numbers compares performance at different disk cache settings without the level 2 cache card installed.

cache video CPU graphics disk math 32KB 8-bit 1.47 1.27 1.71 10.04 64KB 8-bit 1.30 1.27 1.71 10.02 128KB 8-bit 1.32 1.29 1.71 10.02 256KB 8-bit 1.49 1.28 1.57 10.04 512KB 8-bit 1.47 1.29 1.36 10.06

The cache setting should have little influence on non-disk tests, but that isn't the case here. For some reason, possibly an interaction between the size of the disk cache and L2 cache, benchmark scores are significantly depressed at 64-192KB cache sizes (not all tests are reported above). The 10-13% performance drop was completely unexpected and indicates these disk cache settings should probably be avoided.

The following results were obtained with the disk cache set at 128KB. The variable is the presence of a cache or accelerator:

config video CPU graphics disk math no cache 8-bit 0.38 0.39 1.62 1.25 32KB L2 8-bit 0.40 0.46 1.68 1.37 Sonnet 8-bit 1.32 1.29 1.71 10.02

These results show the 40 MHz 68040 accelerator is about 3.5 times faster than the 25 MHz 68030 built into the IIci. Graphics are over 3x faster, while disk scores are only a few points higher. But the biggest improvement is the math scores, due the the fact that the FPU is part of the 68040 processor. For math, the accelerator makes the IIci eight times faster than with no cache, over seven times faster than with Apple's 32 KB cache card.

As a final test, the system was run with the Daystar FastCache control panel installed (in addition to the Sonnet software) and the PowerMath option enabled with a Portrait monitor hooked to internal video. This boosted scores across the board.

cache video CPU graphics disk math stock 4-bit 1.32 1.29 1.61 10.03 Power 4-bit 1.44 1.59 1.77 12.05

Based on this, running the IIci with both the Sonnet Presto card and the FastCache control panel (and PowerMath enabled) will produce the best performance -- at least as measured by Speedometer 4.

Conclusion

Overall results show the accelerated IIci is roughly comparable to the Quadra 650 in performance. Although the Quadra has an even higher math score, others are right in the ballpark.

Whether putting a $300 accelerator in a IIci is a wise decision is another question entirely, especially with used Quadras selling for less than that.


<back to
Mac IIci profile>

Mac Banners

MacPromote Xchange
MacPromote Xchange

Low End Mac established April 7, 1997. This page, the entire Low End Mac site, and all subsites of <http://lowendmac.net/> copyright ©1997-99 by Dan Knight unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.

LINK POLICY: This site allows and encourages links to any public page, so long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking the linked page.

Apple, the Apple logo, Macintosh, and iMac are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of the individual companies and are hereby acknowledged.