★ wanayoo — archive 1999 http://lowendmac.com/tech/dotpitch.shtmlNouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo

Low End MacOnline Tech JournalMac News TodayiBook PageiMac ChannelMacUSBLow End Mac GamingMacInSchoolPower Mac PageRoad ApplesMac DanielMac MetamorphosisMac MusingsMiscellaneous RamblingsThings MacintoshView From the ClassroomThe Rumor Mill

Win an iBook at Smalldog.com


Amazon.com, your source for books, CDs, videos, and more.

.

Monitor Dot Pitch

Daniel Knight, December 1, 1999

For those of us who cut our teeth with 8-bit computers in the late 70s, dot pitch wasn't an issue. A monitor might display 320 dots horizontally by 200 vertically. On a 13" monitor (the norm back then) with 12" viewable, you'd have about 9.5" horizontally. That's 0.75 mm per pixel, so a horizontal dot pitch of 0.50 was more than enough. (See Screen Size and Resolution for more details on this calculation.)

As display resolution improved to 640 pixels (Apple's first color monitor, IBM's EGA and VGA specs), dot pitch started to become an issue. To display a sharp 640x480 image, the horizontal dot pitch on a typical 13" screen would have to be 0.25 or 4 pixels per mm.

Of course, they didn't rate monitors by horizontal dot pitch (or AG, for Aperture Grill) until a few years back, when someone determined that 0.22 mm dot pitch sounded much better than the competition's 0.27 or 0.28.

The big breakthrough of Apple's displays and the VGA standard on the PC side was square pixels. Until then, pixels were either taller than they were wide -- or vice versa. That pretty much came to an end in 1987 with VGA and the first Mac color display. Henceforth, pixels were square.

That makes it easy to compare "regular" dot pitch, which is measured on an angle, with horizontal dot pitch, which is measured across the long dimension of the screen.

A little application of the Pythagorean Theorem (the square of the hypotenuse equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides) and a calculator let us quickly generate the following comparison (approximate, with number rounded to two digits):

dot pitch 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.25
horizontal 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20

Most monitors today claim a dot pitch of 0.27-0.28 or a horizontal dot pitch of about 0.22. In short, a little math shows they offer virtually the same sharpness.

Today, most manufacturers have gone to the better sounding AG or horizontal dot pitch, which makes it much easier to do the calculations in our recent article on Screen Size and Resolution.

But next time you're looking at monitors, do be sure you're comparing the same measurement of dot pitch. If not, use the small table above to translate old fashioned dot pitch with horizontal dot pitch. LEM

Recent articles on Online Tech Journal

<back to Online Tech Journal>

.

Online Tech Journal

Macintosh
Lisa/Macintosh XL
Compact
Mac II
Mac LC
PowerBook (68k)
Performa
500 Series
Centris/Quadra
Power Mac
PowerBook (PPC)
Maclones
Earliest Maclones
DayStar Genesis
Motorola StarMax
Power Computing
Umax SuperMac

MacResQ

Email Lists
Compact Macs
Vintage Macs
Quadlist (68040)
PowerBooks
Power Macs
SuperMacs
Mac Webmasters
more lists
Support
Low End Mac
Outpost.com
MacMall
AuctionMac
Amazon.com
MusicForce

.


Macinstein Banner Exchange
Macinstein Banner Exchange

Macintosh Online Tech Journal begun 1 December 1997. This page and the entire site copyright ©1997-2000 by Dan Knight. All rights reserved.

LINK POLICY: This site allows and encourages links to any public page, so long as the linked page does not appear within a frame that prevents bookmarking the linked page.

Apple, the Apple logo, and Macintosh are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. Additional company and product names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of the individual companies and are respectfully acknowledged.