★ wanayoo — archive 1999 http://www.cpureview.com/art_kernel_cover.htmlNouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo
CPUReview Logo
Try our discussion Forums!
Feature article:
Choosing the
'Right' PC

Home/News  
Articles  
Reviews  
 

Editorials  
Forum/BBS  
About Linux  
Find LowPrice  

TELL A FRIEND
about us!

Cartoons  
Awards  

AMD  
Cyrix/IBM  
IDT WinChip  
Intel  
Rise  

AboutLinux
Sister Site
  

Buy NerdGear: Tux,Mugs,Shirts

Subscribe to our Newsletters:
Name:
E-mail:
Hardware
Linux
Your e-mail address will NOT be sold.
Rumors  
About Us  
Advertising  
Contact Us  
Other Links  
Disclaimer  

All material found on this site is copyrighted by the author, and may not be reprinted, published or used on another site without permission.

All sites are welcome to link to pages in this site, as long as the page is not "framed".

All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners.



 

Linux kernel compilation benchmark

by William Henning
Editor, CPUReview
Copyright July 1, 1998
Copyright April 12,1999
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Introduction

I originally started the "Linux kernel compilation benchmark" on July 1, 1998 with the following introduction:

Since I have been running Linux since the v0.10 days, I thought it would be useful to perform some benchmarks under Linux. Here are my findings.

As I have time (and access to equipment) to add additional results, I will update this page. I have added more PII results on September 1, 1998, M-2 results on September 13&16, 1998, WinChip 6 on November 22, 1998, Celeron 300A results on December 9, 1998, and K6-2 400 on February 16, 1999.

I have been updating this article as often as I have been able to try re-compiling the Linux kernel on new processors; and I will continue to update it as I get access to other processors.

Today (April 4, 1999) I am adding Celeron 400A and K6-3 400 test results. You may find them surprising - I know I was pleasantly surprised!

This article is an ongoing project; and now I have added a bar chart showing the relative performance of all of the processors at all tested clock speeds.

Unfortunately, I have only tested compilation speeds on x86 processors; however should an Alpha, StrongArm, PowerPC, UltraSparc or TransMeta based motherboard find itself at CPUReview you can bet I'll benchmark it... New x86 designs are also welcome :-)

[Editor's Note: the previous paragraph was a blatant attempt to interest manufacturers in CPUReview reviewing their processors. Should you be interested in CPUReview benchmarking your processors / motherboards / video cards etc., please contact me.]

With this latest update there are now 52 separate test results documented in this article. All of the tests were run from the same hard disk, with exactly the same configuration options.

This article now covers: WinChip 240, Cyrix PR233 & PR300, K6-2 266 & 400, K6-3 400, P-2 233 & 333, Celeron 300A and 400A, at specified and overclocked settings.

You may ask: "Why are you not using a newer kernel / compiler / distribution?" - the answer is simple: The results would not be directly comparable with my current database of results!

Continue to System Configurations...

Please sign the SMP petition! Click here to open the form in a new window.

Click on links below to find low prices... (Click HERE to search by keywords)
Processors Athlon (K7) K6-3 K6-2 Celeron 'A' 686/M2 Pentium 2/3 Winchip
Motherboards K7M M750i Abit BP6 BH6 LX6 Super 7 Soyo 5EHM Hot 591P SiS530
Video Cards WinTV Viper770 G400 Xen32 TNT2 TNT XPert128 Voodoo3 V2 G200
Other Goodies ATI-TV SBLive! KDS VS195 DLink 530TX Linux Quake II DVD-RAM
NerdGear2Buy stuffed Tux, Linux/GNU/TCPIP/other T&polo shirts, mugs & more

Go to the home page for news!

Edited by
William Henning
Page design by Web Technologies
Copyright June 5, 1998
All Rights Reserved