★ wanayoo — archive 1999 http://www.devshed.com/Talk/Forums/Forum5/HTML/001982.htmlNouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo
DevShed Menu
* DevShed Home
* Developer News
* DevShed Brain Dump




UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
  DevShed Discussion Forums
  PHP
  rpm php

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   rpm php
pieter guis
Junior Member
posted July 18, 2000 08:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for pieter guis   Click Here to Email pieter guis     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
where can i get an rpm of php4?

Pieter

scollo
Member
posted July 18, 2000 09:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for scollo   Click Here to Email scollo     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote

http://fsr.ku.dk/people/troels/rpms/php/

freebsd
Member
posted July 18, 2000 03:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for freebsd     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
>>where can i get an rpm of php4?

Don't even think about that. You give apache and php maximum flexibility, you definitely need to compile from source. I haven't touched RPMs for 2 years ever since I first tried FreeBSD. It's not too difficult to compile from source.

tarvin
Member
posted July 19, 2000 05:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tarvin   Click Here to Email tarvin     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
RPMs are fine. It's a Tarzan-syndrome when people say that compiling from source is the best thing since sliced bread.

There is a good reason why package systems were invented. Package systems exist for all unix flavors that I have heard of.

Always use your operating system's package system (whether it's Red Hat Linux, Debian, FreeBSD, or whatever) if possible. That makes it easier to perform systematic system administration and cuts down on the need for documentation.

dwarf
Member
posted July 20, 2000 03:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for dwarf     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
I don't think it is a Tarzan-syndrome to compile fro source. RPMs are fine, but they are very limited. After all they are "pre-compiled binaries", so there is no room for tweaking your installation. Lucky for us FreeBSD users there are ports. I don't know who invented those, but they work like a charm.

freebsd
Member
posted July 20, 2000 08:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for freebsd     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
>>Lucky for us FreeBSD users there are ports.
Exactly. That's one of the reasons I ditched Linux. The *BSD's port system are just way better than Linux's RPM.

dwarf
Member
posted July 20, 2000 09:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for dwarf     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Yeah, FreeBSD rocks!!

No, really, I like the ports system because you have the customisation of source-compiling, and the ease of maintenance of a package system. So, all in one place.

freebsd
Member
posted July 20, 2000 05:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for freebsd     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Don't count cvsup out. With cvsup updating your ports and the voluntary works of FreeBSD port maintainers, that make RPM even further behind of FreeBSD port system. I regret for wasting two years playing with Linux.

dwarf
Member
posted July 20, 2000 10:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dwarf     Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Luckily, I only played a couple of months with Linux after discovering "The Demon". Adn to tell you the truth (and with the expense of being wipped) after seeing what FreeBSD can do, I don't know what is this Linux-fuss all about...

All times are MST (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | DevShed.com

Copyright © 1997-2000 ngenuity. All rights reserved.

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.41a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.