★ wanayoo — archive 1999 http://www.networkcomputing.com/netdesign/1015atmwan.htmlNouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo

       
NWC     Internet   Site Map

Getting StartedTechnology GuideDepartmentsresearch CenterSales & Marketing
FAQs Site Map Staff Article Index Current Issue



Building an ATM Wide Area Network

July 26, 1999
By David Willis

If you're in a distributed enterprise and your wide area bandwidth needs are on the rise, an ATM WAN backbone can provide the growth that you're after. At the high end, ATM delivers bandwidth at DS3, OC-3, OC-12, and beyond. At the low end, T1 and Inverse Multiplexing over ATM (IMA) over T1 circuits provides affordable access. Existing frame relay backbones can be merged with and/or migrated to an ATM infrastructure using Frame Relay to ATM service interworking.

Beyond raw capacity, the primary benefit of an ATM backbone is reliable consolidation of traffic types. Historically data, voice, and video networks have proliferated in parallel ISDNVideo, VoiceNet, DataNet PDF Charts each with their own equipment, circuits, management systems, and management personnel. As the speeds in the data network increase while its cost plummets, the data network's capacity relative to the voice and video networks makes it an attractive choice for carrying all traffic types, simplifying management and reducing cost.

ATM isn't the only alternative for traffic consolidation, but its reliability and efficiency make it worth considering. Legacy WANs have long used Time Division Multiplexing to offer timeslots to various traffic types. Unfortunately, most TDM techniques statically allocate a channel to a given traffic type, resulting in a waste capacity when this specific traffic type isn't present, even while other traffic is congested. Alternatively, Frame Relay http://www.networkcomputing.com/netdesign/frame1.html can be used to carry voice and even video http://www.networkcomputing.com/917/917f1.html over the WAN and deliver better utilization of WAN circuits. IP can also carry real-time traffic. However, Frame Relay and IP both lack many essential traffic management and signaling mechanisms to carry delay-and loss-sensitive traffic with the same degree of reliability found in traditional voice and video backbones.



PAGE: 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I 13 I NEXT PAGE
 
Advertisement

Printer Print this Page
E-Mail E-mail this URL
In This Article
arrow  Introduction
arrow  Fundamental Concepts
arrow  Critical Decisions
arrow  Understanding Requirements
arrow  Private vs Public ATM WAN Service
arrow  Addressing and Routing
arrow  Accessing the Network
arrow  Interconnecting with Frame Relay
arrow  Interconnecting with IP Services on the Internet
arrow  Securing the ATM Network
arrow  Selecting a Carrier
arrow  Selecting Equipment
arrow  Managing the Network

arrow  ISDNVideo, VoiceNet, DataNet PDF Charts

Tool
arrow  Events
arrow  IT Training
arrow  Company Directory
arrow  Reader Service

Get NWC
Subscribe to Network Computing magazine and our Free, weekly E-Mail newsletter.


Spotlight
E-Commerce Survey!
Are you conducting E-business? If so, we want to hear from you. Please take a few minutes and fill out our online questionnaire on payment services. You could win a $200.00 American Express gift certificate!


UnixWorld | Network Design Manual | Interactive Buyer's Guide | WANsites | Real-World Labs | Learn IT | Careers | Article Index |

Home | Technology Guides | Site Map | FAQ | Subscriptions | Contacts | Sales & Marketing | 2000 Edit Calendar |

Network Computing

Byte.com |  Bank Systems & Technology |  CMPmetrics |  eBusiness Expo |  File Mine |  InformationWeek |  Insurance & Technology | 
InternetWeek |  PC Expo |  Planet IT |  TechCalendar |  TechEncyclopedia |  TechLearning | 
TechShopper |  TechWeb News |  TechWeb Today |  Wall Street & Technology |  WebTools |  Winmag.com | 


TechWeb is brought to you by CMP Media, Inc., Copyright © 2000 - Privacy Statement